Black magic. That’s what radiofrequency engineers call the mysterious forces guiding communications over the air. These forces involve complex physics and are difficult enough to master on Earth. They only get more baffling when you’re beaming signals into space.Until now, the shape of choice for casting this “magic” has been the parabolic dish. The bigger the antenna dish, the better it is at “catching” or transmitting signals from far away. But CubeSats are changing that. These spacecraft are meant to be light, cheap and extremely small: most aren’t much bigger than a cereal box. Suddenly, antenna designers have to pack their “black magic” into a device where there’s no room for a dish—let alone much else.
“It’s like pulling a rabbit out of a hat,” said Nacer Chahat, a specialist in antenna design, JPL. “Shrinking the size of the radar is a challenge for NASA.” Chahat and his team have been pushing the limits of antenna designs, and recently worked with a CubeSat team on the antenna for Radar In a CubeSat (RainCube), a technology demonstration mission scheduled for launch in 2018. RainCube’s distinctive antenna looks a little like an umbrella stuffed into a jack-in-the-box; when open, its ribs extend out of a canister and splay out a golden mesh.
As its name suggests, RainCube will use radar to measure rain and snowfall. CubeSats are measured in increments of 1U (A CubeSat unit, or 1U = 4″ cubic box, or 10x10x10 cubic cm’s). The RainCube antenna has to be small enough to be crammed into a 1.5U container. To maintain its small size, the antenna relies on the high-frequency, Ka-band wavelength—something that’s still rare for NASA CubeSats, but is ideally suited to RainCube. But Ka-band has other uses besides radar. It allows for an exponential increase in data transfer over long distances, making it the perfect tool for telecommunications. Ka-band allows for data rates about 16X higher than X-band, the current standard on most NASA spacecraft.
In that sense, the development of RainCube’s antenna can test the use of CubeSats more generally. While most have been limited to simple studies in near-Earth orbit, the right technology could allow them to be used as far away as Mars or beyond. That might open up CubeSats to a whole range of future missions.
Chahat was brought on to the RainCube team after he worked on another innovative antenna design. The MarCO (Mars Cube One) mission consists of a pair of Cubesats that have been proposed to fly in 2018 with NASA’s InSight lander, which would measure the Red Planet’s tectonics for the first time. While InSight is touching down, the two MarCO CubeSats would relay information about the landing back to Earth. Just like RainCube, MarCO is primarily a technology demonstration; it would test how future missions could use CubeSats to carry communication relays with them, to see what’s happening on the ground much faster.
The MarCO design looks nothing like a typical antenna. In place of a round dish are 3 flat panels dotted with reflective material. The shape and size of these dots form concentric rings that mimic the curve of a dish. Just as a dish might, this mosaic pattern of dots focuses the signal radiated from the antenna’s feed towards Earth.”New technologies like these allow NASA and JPL to do more with less,” said JPL’s John Baker, program manager for MarCO. “We want to make it possible to explore anywhere we want in the solar system.”
Both RainCube and MarCO highlight creative workarounds to the size limits of CubeSats. The next trick will be combining those designs into an even bigger antenna: a reflectarray ranging 3.3 feet by 3.3 feet and made up of 15 flat panels. These segmented panels would unfold like the flat surface of MarCo’s, while the antenna’s feed would telescope out like RainCube’s antenna. This antenna would be called OMERA, ie One Meter Reflectarray.
A prototype of the OMERA CubeSat is expected to be ready by March of 2017.
“OMERA’s larger array will produce higher gain for telecommunications applications, or will produce narrower beam widths for Earth science needs,” Chahat said. That means we would be able to venture even farther into deep space and will have even more powerful and accurate radars.”
http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news.php?release=2016-291&rn=news.xml&rst=6672
Recent Comments