In the first experiment, two objects always appeared in the same position relative to the room’s boundary; the other two always appeared in the same spot relative to another object acting as a landmark. This image shows the boundary wall and a landmark object. Credit: University of Pennsylvania
Imagine a room or a landscape or a city street. Part of what differentiates that scene from a face or an object is the fact that it has boundaries, and Uni of Pennsylvania researchers Joshua Julian et al aimed to parse out which part of the brain helps perceive those borders. What they learned, through 2 experiments involving transcranial magnetic stimulation, TMS, is that this function falls to the occipital place area, OPA.
The OPA, located near the top of the back of the head, is known for its strong response to visual scenes. “Based on anatomy alone, it’s a region likely to be involved in perception,” Julian said. “That made it a good candidate for involvement in boundary perception.” The researchers decided to test their theory with 24 participants completing one of two TMS studies.
To begin, they took fMRI scans to determine the exact OPA location in each individual, then stimulated this region with TMS, disrupting normal processing for about 20 to 30 minutes. During this period, the participants learned the locations of four objects inside a virtual-reality “room” shown on a desktop computer.
In the 1st experiment, 2 of the objects always appeared in the same position relative to the room’s boundary; the other 2 always appeared in the same spot relative to another object acting as a landmark. After learning these locations, participants exited the room, and all objects but the landmark disappeared. Participants then returned to the room to navigate to where the missing objects previously stood.
They made more errors after OPA stimulation but only for the boundary-related pair. “Stimulation of this region impaired navigation relative to the bounding wall but not the landmark object.”
For the 2nd experiment, subjects were tested in 2 nearly identical virtual-reality arenas, one with a circular boundary wall, the other with no wall but a large circle drawn on the ground. In this case, there was no landmark object. As in the first experiment, the researchers examined participants’ memories for object locations. Despite the close resemblance of the two environments, OPA stimulation only weakened a subject’s ability to determine the location of the missing object in the scene bounded by a wall.
The pair of results tells the scientists that the OPA plays a big role in determining boundaries during navigation.
“This is an important missing piece of the puzzle,” Epstein said. “To navigate, you need to be able to look out at the environment and figure out where you are. It’s one thing to have an internal map of the world, but you can only use it if you can look out and say, ‘Where am I on the map?’ We’re looking at the systems that allow you to do that.”
To date only a handful of researchers have studied the OPA, focusing on its general role in processing scenes, not on its specific function in perceiving barriers. Two other brain regions, the parahippocampal place area and the retrosplenial complex, that respond similarly to scenes had the potential to play a role in boundary perception, but the scientists say their hypotheses came in part due to the dearth of OPA research.
There could be potential for broader implications, for example, new information for diagnosing people with Alzheimer’s, but for now the scientists enjoy the fact that they’re making strides in their field. https://news.upenn.edu/news/penn-research-reveals-brain-region-crucial-boundary-navigation
Recent Comments